Anthropophagite

The word “Anthropophagite” has its roots in ancient Greek, combining anthropos, meaning “human,” and phagein, meaning “to eat.” Originally, it referred quite literally to someone who consumes human flesh. Throughout history, this term has been used to describe certain cultures and tribes that practiced ritualistic cannibalism. One example often mentioned in historical texts involves some indigenous groups from the Amazon region, where human flesh was consumed during specific ceremonies or spiritual rites.

However, the term has evolved beyond its literal meaning. In more figurative contexts, “Anthropophagite” is used to describe individuals or systems that metaphorically “devour” others. This could mean exploiting someone emotionally, socially, or even economically—essentially taking from them in a way that drains their well-being, resources, or dignity. Such exploitation mimics the act of consumption, turning the idea of cannibalism into a broader social commentary.

In this symbolic sense, being labeled an anthropophagite doesn’t necessarily mean engaging in physical acts of cannibalism. Instead, it highlights behaviors that are predatory or parasitic, where one person gains at the significant expense of another. It’s a powerful metaphor that draws attention to how people or institutions can feed off others’ pain, labor, or vulnerability.

Ultimately, the term “Anthropophagite” serves a dual purpose. It offers a historical reference to real practices of cannibalism, while also functioning as a compelling metaphor for modern forms of dehumanization and exploitation. Its dual usage encourages reflection on both past cultural practices and the ongoing ways in which humans can harm or consume each other in less literal—but equally destructive—ways.

Below is my take on the modern cannibal.